Food and Beverage “Failures”
What I Learned at BevNET Live
I went to BevNET Live expecting to talk about flavor profiles, margins, and shelf placement. I came home thinking about one thing instead — a single idea that kept surfacing in panel after panel, hallway conversation after hallway conversation:
*Retailers want to know who your consumers are. And they really want to know that you know who they are.
That second part is the one that stuck with me, so let me unpack both.
A great product isn’t the pitch anymore.
For a long time, the founder mythology in beverage went something like this: build something delicious, get it in a few stores, let word of mouth do the rest. Make the product good enough and the rest takes care of itself.
What I heard at BevNET Live was a gentle but unanimous correction. Buyers are not short on great products. They are drowning in them. Every category — functional soda, prebiotic this, adaptogenic that — has a dozen well-made, beautifully branded contenders fighting for the same sliver of shelf. Taste and packaging get you into the room. They don’t win the room.
What wins the room is a clear answer to the buyer’s actual question, which is rarely “Is this good?” and almost always “Who is going to walk into my store and pull this off the shelf?”
Retailers are placing bets, and they hate uncertainty.
Here’s the reframe that made it click for me. A retailer giving you a facing is making a bet. They’re wagering finite shelf space, the cost of stocking, and the opportunity cost of the brand they didn’t choose. Every SKU they take on is a small act of risk.
So when a buyer asks who your consumer is, they’re not making polite conversation. They’re trying to price the risk. The more precisely you can describe your shopper — not “health-conscious millennials” but the real person, where they already shop, what occasion they’re buying for, what they’re switching away from to get to you — the more you shrink the uncertainty in that bet.
Vague consumer answers signal a vague brand. And a vague brand is a risky bet.
“I know my consumer” has to be demonstrated, not declared
This is the part I underestimated. It’s not enough to have a consumer. You have to prove that you understand them, in a way the buyer can feel.
The brands that impressed buyers at BevNET weren’t the ones who said “we know our customer.” Everyone says that. The ones who stood out brought the receipts:
• Velocity and repeat-purchase data from the doors they’re already in
• A specific account of where their consumer overlaps with the retailer’s existing shopper base
• A point of view on the exact shelf set they belong in and why they’ll lift the category, not cannibalize it
• Evidence of demand they can drive into the store — community, content, a reason their people will show up
That last point matters more than ever. A buyer wants to know you’ll bring traffic, not just occupy space. Demonstrating that you know your consumer well enough to move them is the whole game.
The takeaway I’m bringing home.
If I had to compress two days into one sentence for our team, it would be this: stop leading with the liquid, start leading with the human who drinks it.
Concretely, that means:
1. Get specific about who. Build a real profile — behaviors and occasions, not just demographics.
2. Tie your consumer to their consumer. Walk into every buyer meeting able to explain the overlap.
3. Bring proof. Data, repeat rates, community size — whatever shows you don’t just believe in your shopper, you understand them.
4. Show you can drive them. A retailer is buying your ability to bring people through the door as much as your product.
How to actually find out — on a budget
The good news from all of this: you don’t need a research budget to know your consumer. You need to be systematic about the touchpoints you already pay for. Here’s the scrappy playbook.
Mine what you already have. Turn every demo and sampling table into research — a clipboard or a five-question phone form capturing who stops, what they ask, what they say when they taste it, and what’s already in their cart. If you sell direct, your own data is a goldmine: zip codes reveal trade areas, and repeat-purchase behavior reveals your real consumer, not just your first-timers. And read your reviews and DMs in bulk — the occasions, the “I bought this because…,” and the exact words people use for the benefit all jump out as patterns.
Go where they already are. Spend two hours standing at a door that moves your product. Watch who reaches for the set, talk to a few of them, and ask what they almost bought instead — a handful of these shelf intercepts beats any deck. Then lurk in the communities around your category (Reddit threads, Facebook groups, niche forums) for free qualitative gold in your consumer’s own language, and study who follows and comments on the brands you sit next to on the shelf.
Use cheap structured tools. Send a short survey to existing buyers using a free form tool, with a coupon or free can as the incentive. Put a QR code on your packaging or a shelf talker pointing to a one-question landing page to catch people at the moment of purchase. Pull free Census trade-area data for the neighborhoods around your best doors. And simply ask your broker and distributor for velocity and category data — they often have it and will share it.
Two cautions. Friends and family are not your consumer; they’ll be kind and they’ll skew you, so get to strangers fast. And watch what people do at the shelf, not just what they say in a survey — behavior beats opinion every time.
The throughline: you’re not buying insight, you’re harvesting it from moments you’re already living.
BevNET Live reminded me that distribution isn’t a reward for making something good. It’s a partnership built on shared confidence about a shared customer. The brands that win the shelf are the ones who walk in already knowing — and proving they know — exactly who that customer is.
That’s the work. Time to go do it.
